Claussen, Dane T. 2004, ‘Cognitive Dissonance, Multimedia illiteracy and Public Opinion on News Media', American Behavioral Science tecnistions, Volume twenty four, Issue 2, pp. 212-218.
The content ‘Cognitive Dissonance, Media Illiteracy and Community Opinion about News Media' is examining and speaking about public thoughts and opinions, media illiteracy and intellectual dissonance. The author takes you by using a break down upon public thoughts and opinions of newspapers and tv news and shows for what reason a lot of the quantitative research absorbed the past a lot of decades is in fact invalid. The main purpose of here is info to compare newspaper and television reports, and look into the reasons why one source is more credible and reliable than the other. This individual also examines the drop in the people of both.
Many other scholars possess cited Claussen as to why he believes persons choose TV news over newspaper is because ‘it is usually human nature to want a brand and a face and a voice with communication' (Claussen, 2006). It touches on the concerns raised simply by other papers regarding the creditability of TV SET news and why persons choose to watch the news while entertainment rather than reading papers for the important points, which likewise shows the differences in public judgment over the several decades where the information is gathered. This follows together with fields of study just like journalism, press studies and mass connection as it breaks down how these kind of communication happen to be influential towards the public. This intertwines with psychology, open public sociology and cultural research as the article examines the thought pattern and reasoning about how persons choose their particular preferred type of news intake.
This exploration article can be developed from the findings of quantitative study conducted by U. S. newspaper sector, American Culture of Magazine Editors and the most recently The Ford Foundation. The article itself has two formal titles to break down what is staying discussed and where the info was extracted: 1) Research and Studies About Papers Versus Tv set, and 2) Reasons Why The U. T. Public Provided Television Media A Free Pass. The parts of this article are quite clear. That starts with the introduction, which gives an extensive synopsis of what is being talked about, whom this kind of topic has effects on and the explanations why this information was gathered. It then moves Claussen's main argument under the planning; Studies and Surveys About Newspapers Compared to Televisions. With this section you find the evidence to compliment the author's claims regarding the difference between newspapers and television media and the public's opinion on this matter. The article then moves on to the second heading, Explanations why the U. S. Community Gave Television set News a free of charge Pass, which will itself is known as a bold statement of the author's viewpoint. Constantly referencing Newhagen and Nass' article ‘Differential Criteria to get Evaluating Credibility of Newspapers and TELEVISION SET News' (Newhagen and Nass, 1989), which will shares Claussen's view, this section also serves as a bottom line. This section concludes with the thoughts and opinions that the reasons why people select TV information over newspapers is due to the public's illiteracy of the media. The author has the capacity to communicate his thoughts and ideas obviously without the utilization of diagrams, tables or image aids. This individual uses adequate facts and figures to back up his discussion, in a crystal clear and well structured article. General, the composition of this part has been easy to understand, simple to browse and very informative.
This is a revealing yet persuasive piece; Claussen uses analysis to persuade the audience of his thoughts and opinions on reports consumption by the public. He's writing to a general target audience, anyone who is considering reading about this topic will find it to be an interesting part to read. Chinese is simple and neutral, and it is clear and easy to understand with minimal usage of jargon and hard words. The content is formal, and this individual does not employ descriptive...
Bogart, Leo 1984, ‘The Public's Use and Notion of Newspapers' The Public Judgment Quarterly, volume. 48, number 4, pp. 709 – 719. Recovered January 10, 2012 via JSTOR Databases via Griffith University.
Juric, Pavica 06\ ‘Mass Press Usage throughout a Natural Catastrophe: LSU Students and Typhoon Katrina', Professionals thesis, Louisiana State School, Baton Rouge.
Newhagen, John & Nass, Clifford 1989, ‘Differential Criteria intended for Evaluating Reliability of Newspapers and TELEVISION News', Journalism Quarterly, volume. 66, number 2, pp. 277-281, 284. Retrieved January 9, 2013 from ProQuest Database by means of Griffith University or college.